Bulenox vs FunderPro
The main difference between Bulenox and FunderPro is drawdown type: Bulenox uses trailing eod (floor moves up at end of day) while FunderPro uses static (floor never moves). Bulenox charges from $125, FunderPro from $159. Profit splits: 80-90% vs 80-90%. Updated March 2026.
Bulenox uses trailing eod (floor moves up at end of day) with a 2.2% daily loss limit and 80-90% profit split. FunderPro uses static (floor never moves) with a 5% daily loss limit and 80-90% profit split. Bulenox starts from $125; FunderPro from $159.
If you want more forgiving drawdown rules, FunderPro is the better choice. Static drawdown means your profits create genuine breathing room, while Bulenox's trailing eod (floor moves up at end of day) raises the floor as you profit. Both offer the same maximum profit split of 90%.
| Bulenox | FunderPro | |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Type | 1-step | 1-step |
| Drawdown Type | Trailing EOD (floor moves up at end of day) | Static (floor never moves) |
| Daily Loss Limit | 2.2% | 5% |
| Max Drawdown | 3.5% | 10% |
| Profit Target | 6% | 10% |
| Min Trading Days | 5 | 5 |
| Profit Split | 80-90% | 80-90% |
| Payout Frequency | Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly |
| News Trading | allowed | allowed |
| Overnight Holding | No | Yes |
| Weekend Holding | No | Yes |
| EA / Bots | Allowed | Allowed |
| Markets | futures | forex, indices, commodities, crypto |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Rithmic | MT5, cTrader |
| Cheapest Account | $125 ($25,000) | $159 ($25,000) |
Scalping / Day Trading
FunderPro allows overnight holding, giving more flexibility. FunderPro's static drawdown is more forgiving for scalpers.
Swing Trading
FunderPro is better — allows weekend holding. Bulenox requires you to flatten before close.
Budget-Conscious
Bulenox is cheaper to start ($125 vs $159).
Bulenox is the better fit if you trade futures exclusively. The EOD trailing drawdown gives you flexibility during the session since the floor only updates at the close, which suits active day traders who have intraday swings.
- +Very affordable challenge fees with frequent sales
- +EOD trailing drawdown (not intraday)
- +No consistency rule
- +$25K account option for small capital traders
Bulenox supports NinjaTrader, Rithmic and processes payouts bi-weekly. News trading is fully allowed, so you can trade NFP, FOMC, and CPI without restrictions. Automated trading with EAs is permitted.
FunderPro is the better fit if you focus on forex and CFDs. The static drawdown means every dollar of profit adds to your safety cushion, making it ideal for traders who build equity gradually and want protection from losing streaks.
- +1-step evaluation — skip phase 2
- +Static drawdown
- +cTrader supported
- +Accounts up to $200K
FunderPro supports MT5, cTrader and processes payouts bi-weekly. News trading is fully allowed, so you can trade NFP, FOMC, and CPI without restrictions. Both overnight and weekend holding are permitted, giving swing traders full flexibility. Automated trading with EAs is permitted.
Choosing between Bulenox and FunderPro comes down to three things: the markets you trade, how much drawdown flexibility you need, and your budget. If you trade futures, Bulenox is your only option here. If you trade forex or indices or commodities or crypto, go with FunderPro. Bulenox is cheaper to get started at $125 vs $159.
The biggest structural difference is drawdown type: Bulenox uses trailing eod (floor moves up at end of day) while FunderPro uses static (floor never moves). Static drawdown is objectively more forgiving because profits create a permanent cushion. Trailing drawdown follows your equity peaks, meaning you can lose an account even while net profitable. If you are still undecided, take the firm finder quiz for a personalized recommendation based on your trading style, risk tolerance, and budget.